whitetiger0990


« on: September 01, 2003, 10:08:41 PM » 

1 + 1 = 2 2  1 = 1 1 * 1 = 1 1 / 1 = 1 1 + 1  1 * 1 / 1 = 1 it all makes sense! Isn't it wierd?



Logged

[size=10]Back by popular demand! I will byte and nibble you bit by bit until nothing remains but crumbs.[/size]



Ninkazu


« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2003, 10:13:35 PM » 

This doesn't even deserve a response, but I just have to say this: yu0 isz r3+42d



Logged

am an asshole. Get used to it.



whitetiger0990


« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2003, 10:22:33 PM » 

ALEIN!!!!



Logged

[size=10]Back by popular demand! I will byte and nibble you bit by bit until nothing remains but crumbs.[/size]



SCM
Wandering Guru
Posts: 311


« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2003, 11:49:30 PM » 

3 + 3 = 6 6  3 = 3 3 * 3 = 9 9 / 3 = 3 3 + 3  3 * 3 / 3 = 3 Most of what you have there would be true for any number. The second line is just the inverse of the first, and the fourth is the inverse of the third. In the fifth the added and subtracted terms are equal, so you are adding 0, and you don't change the original value. You have more ones than I have threes because one is the multiplicative identity (this just means that any number is left unchanged when multiplied it by one)



Logged

hrist Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am first.(I Timothy 1:15)
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life.(John 3:16)



Ninkazu


« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2003, 11:52:06 PM » 

3 + 3  3 * 3 / 3 = 1 (6  9) / 3 = 1 3 / 3 = 1
jeez.



Logged

am an asshole. Get used to it.



SCM
Wandering Guru
Posts: 311


« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2003, 12:02:57 AM » 

Ninkazu, use proper order of operations. Multiplication and division come before addition and subtraction (you may have been taught PEMDAS). 3 + 3  3 * 3 / 3 = 3 + 3  9 / 3 = 3 + 3  3 = 3 + 0 = 3 If you are not sure about this, try IF 3 + 3  3 * 3 / 3 = 3 THEN PRINT "It's true"



Logged

hrist Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am first.(I Timothy 1:15)
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life.(John 3:16)



whitetiger0990


« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2003, 12:05:26 AM » 

so you see my observation is correct



Logged

[size=10]Back by popular demand! I will byte and nibble you bit by bit until nothing remains but crumbs.[/size]



Moneo


« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2003, 12:44:04 AM » 

WhiteTiger,
You forgot: N^0 = 1 where N can be any number. *****



Logged




Diroga


« Reply #8 on: September 02, 2003, 02:53:07 AM » 

uh..what are you trying to get at that i dont see



Logged




oracle


« Reply #9 on: September 02, 2003, 03:25:22 AM » 

Well done, you've just proved that 1=1, I'm sure, however, that that fact has already been proven by far smarter brains than ours.
Here, lets prove something a little more complicated: .9(recuring) = 1
n = .9(recuring) 10n = 9.9(recuring) 9n = 8.9(recuring) (subtract this line from line 2) n = 1
Now, who can prove that the square root of 2 cannot be written in the ratio of two integers? That's a little more tricky, but let's do the easy ones first.



Logged




ak00ma


« Reply #10 on: September 02, 2003, 03:55:20 AM » 

if n is equal to .9 and you multiply n with 10 then it equals 9 and not 9.9, or did I missunderstand something???



Logged

B 4 EVER



SCM
Wandering Guru
Posts: 311


« Reply #11 on: September 02, 2003, 04:28:57 AM » 

n = 0.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999... It keeps repeating forever. The formal mathematical method for proving it involves showing that you can't find any number between 0.9... and one. If no number exists between two numbers then they are really the same number.



Logged

hrist Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am first.(I Timothy 1:15)
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life.(John 3:16)



oracle


« Reply #12 on: September 02, 2003, 05:02:55 AM » 

n = 0.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999... It keeps repeating forever. The formal mathematical method for proving it involves showing that you can't find any number between 0.9... and one. If no number exists between two numbers then they are really the same number. Correct. I think it is called "dense" when there is no number between 2 numbers. So, anyone know how to prove that root 2 aint a fraction?



Logged




Flexibal


« Reply #13 on: September 02, 2003, 05:50:19 AM » 

yes, tis simple:
let the square root of 2 be a rational number, which we'll represent as a/b.
so
sqr(2) = a/b 2 = a^2 / b^2 2 * b^2 = a^2
now, according to the rules of even numbers, any number multiplied by two is even. so (2*b^2) is even, and since (a) equals it, (a^2) is even as well.
another rule of even numbers is that an even number squared is an even number. since we already found out that (a^2) is an even number, it means (a) is an even number.
because a is even, we can represent it an a multiple of 2 and a natural number:
a = 2*c
we get
2*b^2 = (2*c)^2 2*b^2 = 4*c^2 b^2 = 2*c^2
hence (b^2) is also even, and therefore (b) is even as well.
now, if (a) and (b) are even numbers, they are both multiples of 2, which means we can reduce them into a simpler form.
a = 2*c b = 2*d a/b = (2*c)/(2*d) = c/d
so
a/b = c/d = sqr(2)
and this whole process will start over  we'll see that both (c) and (d) are even numbers.... etc. this means that the fraction that represents sqr(2) can be always reduced by 2, which contradicts one of the rules of rational numbers (can be reduced only a finite number of times).
therefore, sqr(2) cannot be represented as a rational number.

also, i came up with some hypothesis of my own.
now rational number squared can result in an integer, except for integers. e.g.
integer^2 = integer
rationalthatisnotaninteger ^ 2 != willneverbeaninteger
irrational ^ 2 = maybeaninteger
like the square root of 2 is irrational, but squaring it results in an rational number (2)... while (a/b)^2, where a, b are integers, a!=b, and b!=1, will never result in an integer.
this hypothesis is quite interesting, because it will allow you to prove that any square root that is not an integer, is necessarily irrational.
so we can prove that sqr(2) is irrational, but how could you prove that sqr(3) is irrational just as well? that evennumbers trick will not work here....
so if my hypothesis is correct, you can say that any noninteger square root is irrational.

[Flexibal>



Logged




Agamemnus


« Reply #14 on: September 02, 2003, 12:48:15 PM » 

3 + 3 = 6 6  3 = 3 3 * 3 = 9 9 / 3 = 3 3 + 3  3 * 3 / 3 = 3
is: (a + a  a) * a / a which is: a + a  a which is: a. Erroneously assuming it is: "a + a  a * a / a = a + a  a = a" gives the same answer. But it's WRONG!



Logged

Peace cannot be obtained without war. Why? If there is already peace, it is unnecessary for war. If there is no peace, there is already war." Visit www.neobasic.net to see rubbish in all its finest.



